Fortress Forever

Go Back   Fortress Forever > Community > General Discussion

View Poll Results: Which design do you prefer?
A. High Power, Low Survivability 1 5.56%
B. Balanced Power & Survivability 13 72.22%
C. Low Power, High Survivability 4 22.22%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-19-2010, 12:03 PM   #1
Bridget
Banned
 
Bridget's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Class/Position: Soldier
Gametype: AVD
Affiliations: TALOS
Posts Rated Helpful 5 Times
Which SG design do you prefer?

What design philosophy do you prefer for the Sentry Gun? This poll seems redundant given the middle option, but I can't be too sure of what people might want, and I don't want to presume what the they want, so I decided to create a poll to get actual input.

A. High Power, Low Survivability
The Sentry Gun deals huge damage and has very little survivability. It can mow down a Heavy as if he were a Scout, but when focus fired, it can easily be destroyed by a few nails from a Medic's Super Nailgun. Because of the low survivability, the Engineer becomes obligated to maintaining it and can not support it.

B. Balanced Power & Survivability
The Sentry Gun deals moderate damage with moderate survivability. It can't kill a Heavy in a fraction of a second nor does it die by a few nails. The Engineer has to dedicate equal time to maintaining his gun and supporting his gun.

C. Low Power, High Survivability
The Sentry Gun deals low supportive damage but has huge survivability. It takes a while to kill a Heavy though can easily absorb nails and fragmentation grenades with tons of health to spare. (Perhaps, it could even survive a MIRV?) The Engineer no longer has to 'babysit' his gun in this condition, instead he is freed to move around the immediate area while using its supportive fire in combination with his own.

Of course, if you have some other variation (if possible) explain in detail.

Last edited by Bridget; 07-19-2010 at 12:09 PM.
Bridget is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-19-2010, 05:01 PM   #2
Crazycarl
D&A Member
Wiki Team
Fortress Forever Staff
 
Crazycarl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts Rated Helpful 31 Times
B but on the side of A. If you can run past the gun without dying, it's useless. However, no player should ever die from a sentry without having the chance to know what's happening and get away.

There's a third important variable here, and that's how quickly you can get a sentry build and upgraded. If the sentry dies easily, but you can get another within seconds, that's fine too. That has a side effect of making the engineer's survival more important.
Crazycarl is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-19-2010, 05:09 PM   #3
Elmo
Gets tickled by FF
Fortress Forever Staff
 
Elmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: UK
Class/Position: Med Solly HW
Gametype: Any/CTF
Posts Rated Helpful 41 Times
Carl's points work for me.
__________________
Support FF:
Done: ff_monkey
Done: ff_bases
Done: ff_warpath
Forever Doing: ff_medieval (beta#99999999)

Last edited by Elmo; 07-19-2010 at 05:09 PM.
Elmo is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-19-2010, 06:16 PM   #4
chilledsanity
D&A Member
 
chilledsanity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Gametype: AvD, I/D, waterpolo, hunted
Posts Rated Helpful 6 Times
Quick question: Which version is TFC's gun? Which is FF 1.0's gun?

From your descriptions it sounds like none of them. TFC's is definitely high power, but it also provides a splash protection shield that the engineer can hide behind.

FF 1.0's didn't have splash protection, but it had more hitpoints to compensate for that.

In both cases, if you maintain them, they have high power, high survivability. If you don't maintain them, they have high power, low survivability. Also I hate the "disposable sentry" style of making low power, low survivability, but quick to get up that Crazycarl's proposed (and what we have now).

I don't think my option is here.

Last edited by chilledsanity; 07-19-2010 at 06:18 PM.
chilledsanity is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-20-2010, 05:03 AM   #5
Pixel
if(0>1){printf("broked");}
Beta Tester
 
Pixel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Amerika
Class/Position: O
Posts Rated Helpful 3 Times
There is also the time it takes to detect enemies and turning time. These are also important variables to consider.

I still like my idea of an temporary sg shield. The shield would only be available after it charged up. The shield could reduce the damage taken by half or so. Would give the sg higher survivability against nades, while not making it impossible to take out with nades. The shield less useful in the event of nailgun fire.

Would give the engineer more options and add a certain skill to playing engineer.
Pixel is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-21-2010, 09:48 AM   #6
zE
Pew pew ze beams
 
zE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Gametype: Gathers
Affiliations: pew pew
Posts Rated Helpful 11 Times


D: offtopic but its partial highthvis sentry retexture

Last edited by zE; 07-21-2010 at 09:50 AM.
zE is offline   Reply With Quote


Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.