Difference between revisions of "Talk:Weapon:Tranquilizer Gun"
From Fortress Forever Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchPhisionary (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
That makes sense. Also we should probably do something about the interestingly fun notes on the page at some point... --[[User:AgentBuckshotMoose-5554|ABM]] (who forgot his sig too) | That makes sense. Also we should probably do something about the interestingly fun notes on the page at some point... --[[User:AgentBuckshotMoose-5554|ABM]] (who forgot his sig too) | ||
:I was considering deleting them, but I think they could be useful as a resource on the talk page. --[[User:Hirohito|Hirohito]] 22:51, 29 December 2007 (CST) | :I was considering deleting them, but I think they could be useful as a resource on the talk page. --[[User:Hirohito|Hirohito]] 22:51, 29 December 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | ::Yes, I think all the weapon pages need a substantial redesign. They're ugly, have irrelevant information, and could really benefit from some reorganization. Hopefully someone with good Template design skills (like maybe... Squeek, *hint* *hint*, and awesome job reworking those weapon tables, btw) will want to take up the job. I'm still figuring that stuff out, and it would probably still be all ugly if I did it. | ||
| + | ::Well, whatever, bla bla. If anyone has any comments on how the new templates need to be organized, post em here, or a User page or something. What does everybody feel about the way Template:Class is set up anyway? It's nice because it's easy to keep the pages consistant, but it seems to be a pain when editing. Section edit links making no sense, for example. --[[User:Phisionary|Phisionary]] 23:29, 29 December 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 22:29, 29 December 2007
I'm considering moving this page to Weapon:Tranquilizer Gun. Does anyone have any objections to that? --Phisionary 22:31, 29 December 2007 (CST)
That makes sense. Also we should probably do something about the interestingly fun notes on the page at some point... --ABM (who forgot his sig too)
- I was considering deleting them, but I think they could be useful as a resource on the talk page. --Hirohito 22:51, 29 December 2007 (CST)
- Yes, I think all the weapon pages need a substantial redesign. They're ugly, have irrelevant information, and could really benefit from some reorganization. Hopefully someone with good Template design skills (like maybe... Squeek, *hint* *hint*, and awesome job reworking those weapon tables, btw) will want to take up the job. I'm still figuring that stuff out, and it would probably still be all ugly if I did it.
- Well, whatever, bla bla. If anyone has any comments on how the new templates need to be organized, post em here, or a User page or something. What does everybody feel about the way Template:Class is set up anyway? It's nice because it's easy to keep the pages consistant, but it seems to be a pain when editing. Section edit links making no sense, for example. --Phisionary 23:29, 29 December 2007 (CST)
