Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Infobox manual/Doc"

From Fortress Forever Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
:How so?  What is width of your screen horizontally?  I noticed it looks a bit odd on 800x600, but seemed okay on 1024 resolution.  Is there a page in particular that looks bad?
 
:How so?  What is width of your screen horizontally?  I noticed it looks a bit odd on 800x600, but seemed okay on 1024 resolution.  Is there a page in particular that looks bad?
 
:I could see taking it down to around 200px width, if it's better that way. It's hard for me to tell, I have a big screen.  =D  --[[User:Phisionary|Phisionary]] 15:02, 1 January 2008 (CST)
 
:I could see taking it down to around 200px width, if it's better that way. It's hard for me to tell, I have a big screen.  =D  --[[User:Phisionary|Phisionary]] 15:02, 1 January 2008 (CST)
 +
::The current version in use is 280px wide.  I've made one at [[Template:Infobox_manual/Narrow]] that is 214px wide.  Still looks okay.  I think it would be possible to make one 200 or 190, but narrower than that is tough, and will start to get pretty long too.  I dunno. --[[User:Phisionary|Phisionary]] 16:31, 1 January 2008 (CST)

Revision as of 15:31, 1 January 2008

THe "header" code doesn't work. "Footer" works fine. --Hirohito 17:22, 31 December 2007 (CST)

Nevermind. It appears I need to use both of them if I want it on top. --Hirohito 17:26, 31 December 2007 (CST)

This is a bit big, all the actual page content is being squashed up and made half-unreadable on my screen. Mirvinmonkey-3

How so? What is width of your screen horizontally? I noticed it looks a bit odd on 800x600, but seemed okay on 1024 resolution. Is there a page in particular that looks bad?
I could see taking it down to around 200px width, if it's better that way. It's hard for me to tell, I have a big screen. =D --Phisionary 15:02, 1 January 2008 (CST)
The current version in use is 280px wide. I've made one at Template:Infobox_manual/Narrow that is 214px wide. Still looks okay. I think it would be possible to make one 200 or 190, but narrower than that is tough, and will start to get pretty long too. I dunno. --Phisionary 16:31, 1 January 2008 (CST)