Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Weapons"
From Fortress Forever Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchPhisionary (talk | contribs) (New page: ==Dated information== Is there a purpose to having separations of hitscan and projectile weapons? I think these designations are remnants of development use of the wiki, and are no longer...) |
Phisionary (talk | contribs) m (forgot my sig.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Secondly, is the Tommygun defunct? It's not equipped as default, but could it be a map feature to equip it? Are code and models still in working form? The model seems to be okay still. A dev opinion on this would be nice. | Secondly, is the Tommygun defunct? It's not equipped as default, but could it be a map feature to equip it? Are code and models still in working form? The model seems to be okay still. A dev opinion on this would be nice. | ||
| − | Lastly, someone should add SG/disp to this soon in the 'special' section. I will when/if I reformat the list- if no-one does. | + | Lastly, someone should add SG/disp to this soon in the 'special' section. I will when/if I reformat the list- if no-one does. --[[User:Phisionary|Phisionary]] 17:54, 28 December 2007 (CST) |
Revision as of 16:54, 28 December 2007
Dated information
Is there a purpose to having separations of hitscan and projectile weapons? I think these designations are remnants of development use of the wiki, and are no longer necessary. Players don't care how the weapon is implemented. Perhaps making clear that weapons like the nailgun are not instantaneous hits would keep things clear enough.
Secondly, is the Tommygun defunct? It's not equipped as default, but could it be a map feature to equip it? Are code and models still in working form? The model seems to be okay still. A dev opinion on this would be nice.
Lastly, someone should add SG/disp to this soon in the 'special' section. I will when/if I reformat the list- if no-one does. --Phisionary 17:54, 28 December 2007 (CST)
