Difference between revisions of "Talk:Class:Demoman"
From Fortress Forever Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchPhisionary (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Some images wouldn't be bad. Maybe an in-game screenie of a Demoman crouching near a Pipe-bomb trap. Also, there's no image for Detpack. Looks good otherwise. --[[User:Phisionary|Phisionary]] 13:30, 30 December 2007 (CST) | :Some images wouldn't be bad. Maybe an in-game screenie of a Demoman crouching near a Pipe-bomb trap. Also, there's no image for Detpack. Looks good otherwise. --[[User:Phisionary|Phisionary]] 13:30, 30 December 2007 (CST) | ||
| − | I know that its technically a buildable, but perhaps we should put the detpack down as a weapon since it behaves mostly like one (has a slot, viewmodel, you throw it into the world, it kills people) | + | I know that its technically a buildable, but perhaps we should put the detpack down as a weapon since it behaves mostly like one (has a slot, viewmodel, you throw it into the world, it kills people) [[User:Mirvinmonkey-3|Mirvinmonkey-3]] 15:22, 30 December 2007 (CST) |
| + | |||
| + | :As in, putting it as a weapon instead of a special ability? or would it be about the Buildable:Detpack vs Weapon:Detpack page thing? --[[User:AgentBuckshotMoose-5554|Agent Buckshot Moose]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Well, I'm in favor of moving to Buildable:Detpack, but I think all buildables should be placed in the Weapon area -- on this page, I mean -- and also for engies (and likewise include them on the weapon navigation template) since they are used in much the same fashion. --[[User:Phisionary|Phisionary]] 20:22, 30 December 2007 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:22, 30 December 2007
Rating
I think this article is complete, so I gave it a four star rating. Does anyone disagree or notice anything that needs to be added to make it fit the rating? --Agent Buckshot Moose
- Some images wouldn't be bad. Maybe an in-game screenie of a Demoman crouching near a Pipe-bomb trap. Also, there's no image for Detpack. Looks good otherwise. --Phisionary 13:30, 30 December 2007 (CST)
I know that its technically a buildable, but perhaps we should put the detpack down as a weapon since it behaves mostly like one (has a slot, viewmodel, you throw it into the world, it kills people) Mirvinmonkey-3 15:22, 30 December 2007 (CST)
- As in, putting it as a weapon instead of a special ability? or would it be about the Buildable:Detpack vs Weapon:Detpack page thing? --Agent Buckshot Moose
- Well, I'm in favor of moving to Buildable:Detpack, but I think all buildables should be placed in the Weapon area -- on this page, I mean -- and also for engies (and likewise include them on the weapon navigation template) since they are used in much the same fashion. --Phisionary 20:22, 30 December 2007 (CST)
