Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Inline Weapon"
(New page: I think it looks a lot better without a border surrounding the image. Anybody else agree? --~~~~) |
Phisionary (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think it looks a lot better without a border surrounding the image. Anybody else agree? --[[User:Hirohito|Hirohito]] 19:10, 1 January 2008 (CST) | I think it looks a lot better without a border surrounding the image. Anybody else agree? --[[User:Hirohito|Hirohito]] 19:10, 1 January 2008 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | WOW! These new weapon pictures are ACE! Amazing job. --[[User:Squeek-10494|Squeek-10494]] 01:10, 2 January 2008 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It occurs to me there is a good reason for the size being essentially hard coded into the template. If one wants to change the size for design reasons, it's much easier to do without a lot of manual edits. | ||
| + | Since not all the images I use with this template are the same aspect, I think sizing them by vertical pixel size might be the way to go, and set the default on here to what it is now (I think 95px). I don't remember how to do this right now, and don't know where I saw it. | ||
| + | Now that I think about it, too much work for little payoff. Let me put it this way, if anyone changes the design around, the above should be done. Otherwise, nevermind :\ --[[User:Phisionary|Phisionary]] 00:20, 3 January 2008 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:20, 2 January 2008
I think it looks a lot better without a border surrounding the image. Anybody else agree? --Hirohito 19:10, 1 January 2008 (CST)
WOW! These new weapon pictures are ACE! Amazing job. --Squeek-10494 01:10, 2 January 2008 (CST)
It occurs to me there is a good reason for the size being essentially hard coded into the template. If one wants to change the size for design reasons, it's much easier to do without a lot of manual edits. Since not all the images I use with this template are the same aspect, I think sizing them by vertical pixel size might be the way to go, and set the default on here to what it is now (I think 95px). I don't remember how to do this right now, and don't know where I saw it. Now that I think about it, too much work for little payoff. Let me put it this way, if anyone changes the design around, the above should be done. Otherwise, nevermind :\ --Phisionary 00:20, 3 January 2008 (CST)
