Difference between revisions of "Talk:Class:Pyro"
From Fortress Forever Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (New section: Role) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I see. It was only if he had armor in TFC. Didn't know if it had changed or not. --[[User:AgentBuckshotMoose-5554|Agent Buckshot Moose]] | :I see. It was only if he had armor in TFC. Didn't know if it had changed or not. --[[User:AgentBuckshotMoose-5554|Agent Buckshot Moose]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Role == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I put the role as "hybrid," but I can see where it could be considered offense as well. What does everyone think? [[User:AgentBuckshotMoose-5554|AgentBuckshotMoose-5554]] 11:14, 18 June 2008 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 08:14, 18 June 2008
Just as an FYI, the Pyro is flame-retardant, even if he has no armor. --Hirohito 08:48, 31 December 2007 (CST)
- I see. It was only if he had armor in TFC. Didn't know if it had changed or not. --Agent Buckshot Moose
Role
I put the role as "hybrid," but I can see where it could be considered offense as well. What does everyone think? AgentBuckshotMoose-5554 11:14, 18 June 2008 (CDT)
